GIDDY DISINHIBITION DISORDER
GIDDY DISINHIBITION DISORDER update 2006
Giddy Disinhibition Disorder is a clinical symptom cluster identified
at Madison County Hospital in the late 1980’s. The following
article was published in the journal Primary Psychiatry in June 2002.
Primary Psychiatry archives are not commonly accessible. Therefore
permission has been obtained to post the article on this website.
Further documentation of this clinical syndrome is in preparation.
There are the following observations have been made since this article
was published.
- One variation has been identified which could perhaps be called “Gleeful
Aggression” These individuals have a laughing or smirking
look and attitude when they are aggressive but may not show other
symptoms
of endorphin disinhibition. Treatment with naltrexone is frequently
able to diminish the pleasure of the aggression and frequently
stop it completely.
- Recently, giddy disinhibition has been
seen in a number of children who have oppositional behavior and
rage. They also demonstrate
a
silly “don’t care” attitude when adults attempt
to correct them. Naltrexone treatment often stops this behavior.
- There has been enough experience to determine that most children
who demonstrate giddy disinhibition symptoms will outgrow them
within ten years. It therefore is better to consider Giddy
Disinhibition as an immature behavior rather than a life-long disorder.
There
are
a few individuals who have not tolerated attempts to discontinue
the naltrexone, but they also demonstrate lack of maturity.
-
The most common side effect is sedation. Several individuals
have had an immediate depressive reaction with crying even
when given
the low dose of 25 mg. It has not been proven whether such
individuals will respond to an extremely low dose.
Clinical Focus.
Primary Psychiatry. 2002:9(6):63-65
GIDDY DISINHIBITION DISORDER :
A BEHAVIOR DISORDER SEEMINGLY RELATED TO ENDORPHIN IMBALANCE (revised)
Ralph Ankenman, MD
Abstract:
Are disorders distinct from attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder
(ADHD) prevalent in the over-active patient population? Giddy
Disinhibition Disorder (GDD), a newly described syndrome of impulsive
behavior,
is distinctive in that the patient shows disinhibited, euphoric
reaction to life events. GDD is often co-existent with other
behavioral syndromes such as ADHD and obsessive- compulsive disorder,
but
has several unique symptoms such as an almost constant giddiness,
inability to demonstrate a serious response to consequences,
and pain-seeking behavior. GDD is also unique in its response
to therapy
with naltrexone, which is an oral narcotic antagonist – an
opioid receptor blocker. Naltrexone doses for GDD are up to three
times higher than the 50 mg/day used for treating drug dependency.
GDD is most often seen in developmentally disabled (DD) patients.
In the author’s outpatient clinic for DD patients, approximately
10% receive naltrexone therapy. Some patients without developmental
disability have been diagnosed with GDD and treated. One such individual’s
personal description of his experience illustrates some of the
unique features of this disorder.

Introduction:
The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth
Edition (DSM-IV),?. does not include many behavioral situations
seen in psychiatry, particularly in the developmentally disabled
(DD) population, where functional immaturity often contributes
to psychiatric symptomology. Thus, in treating the DD population,
physicians are likely to encounter syndromes not identified among
the standard population. Since 1991, the Madison County Hospital
Special Psychiatric Service, in London, Ohio, has diagnosed certain
DD individuals as having a disorder not previously defined and
has treated them accordingly. The treating physicians have termed
that condition “Giddy Disinhibition Disorder” (GDD),
due to the increased level of giddy behavior observed in these
patients in their social interactions. GDD patients demonstrate
extreme tendencies to seek continuous pleasure-producing stimulation.
They do not respond well to typical psychotropic medication regimes,
but many of them demonstrate improved behavior when treated with
the opioid-receptor blocker naltrexone. This paper describes the
clinical features, prevalence and results of therapy for this proposed
disorder.
Due to the prevalence of co-morbid conditions in the D.D. population,
patients with GDD were rarely treated with Naltrexone monotherapy
in the Madison County Hospital clinic. However, there were enough
cases of outstanding changes in behavior when naltrexone was added
to the medication regime that it seems legitimate to propose GDD
as a distinct disorder with a distinct treatment, and to expect that
other clinicians will start to recognize it the future.

Identification and treatment of Giddy
Disinhibition Disorder:
Individuals with GDD are often mistaken for having ADHD. They especially
have many of the behaviors in the ADHD hyperactivity/impulsivity
criteria such as fidgeting, inability to stay seated, inability
to play quietly, and being “on the go.” However, the
GDD patient exhibits several distinct differences:
- The patient is continuously
giddy, demonstrating excessive, inappropriate enjoyment
of repetitive maladaptive acts. (e.g.,
the first patient treated would turn over the living room table
again and again, laughing each time).
- The patient does not
alter his/her behavior in response to negative reinforcement.
Verbal and even physical confrontation generally
brings on more giddy reactivity and laughing.
- The patient may
not exhibit any defensive reaction against attempts at
physical control. If one grabs the patient’s arm
in an effort to redirect him/her, the arm may remain non-responsive
and “flabby”.
- The patient often seems immune
to physical pain and will even seek it at times (e.g. several
individuals would
seek to slam
a finger into the hinge side of a closing door or stick a finger
into electrical outlets to get shocked).
- In addition to the
other four symptoms, the patient does not gain significant,
lasting benefits from treatment with psychostimulants.
Much of the giddy behavior seen in DD psychiatric patients
is attributable to their immaturity. The Madison County
Hospital
clinic derived
the new designation “GDD” for those patients who had
such extreme giddy reactivity that it was the dominating problem
of their clinical presentation. Standard medication regimes for
treating impulsivity were minimally helpful, but, in some cases,
the symptoms improved markedly with the administration of the opioid
receptor blocker, naltrexone. The use of this medication was attempted
because these individuals demonstrated not only indifference to
physical pain, but also indifference to the social pressure of
authority. This indifference to authority seemed similar to that
of some narcotic addicts when they are “high”. It
was hypothesized that individuals with GDD might have excessive
endorphin
activity and might respond to a narcotic-blocking medication.

Use Of An Opioid Receptor Blocker:
Use of opioid receptor blockers in the DD population has
been occasionally mentioned in the literature, particularly
for treating self-abusive
behavior. Two important understandings were gleaned from these
reports.
A. Some individuals responded instantly, even responding transiently
to the short-acting medication naloxone.2. This suggested the
existence of an intrinsically high endorphin function that could
be counteracted
immediately;
B. There was a commonly stated effective dosage of 1-2
mg/kg/day.
Our clinic had seen successful treatment of self-abusive behavior
with naltrexone in less than 20% of those administered the drug.
A much higher percentage of GDD patients responded to naltrexone,
and the response was surprisingly rapid. The first patient treated
had decreased “pesky” behavior and “obnoxious” compulsions
within two days. One child with fetal alcohol syndrome demonstrated
increased verbalizations/responses to questions, and a decrease in
giddiness after three weeks of treatment. Individuals who had been
in a constant state of disinhibition became more responsive to caregiver
direction. However, they could still develop giddy arousal. In general,
most individuals were about 50% less giddy. The efficacy of naltrexone
was convincingly demonstrated in some patients who were given a low
dose in the morning. Their behavior would be controlled until mid-afternoon
and then become disinhibited. This responded to the addition of a
second dose.
Over one hundred patients in the Madison County Hospital clinic
have been given a trial of naltrexone for symptoms suggesting GDD.
In certain individuals, symptoms of the disorder dominated their
entire presenting behavior and persisted for years -- suggesting
that they had a distinct pathological syndrome; but in others who
responded to naltrexone therapy, GDD symptoms were relatively minor
and seemed to resolve over time. There is therefore a question
of whether the disrupted physiology involved in GDD represents
a true pathology or an exaggeration of immaturity. Approximately
50% of responders demonstrated considerable improvement with naltrexone
therapy. The others showed modest but sufficient benefit to warrant
continued use. Of the 484 DD patients currently treated by the
outpatient service, 46 are presently receiving naltrexone. Most
of the recipients are young: 55 % are 10-20 years of age, and 44%
are 20-30 years of age; one patient is over 30 years old. The dosage
range is 50 -200 mg/day (0.5-3.0 mg/kg/day). Sixty-four percent
of current patients receive 1.4-2.4 mg/kg; and the mean is 1.7
mg/kg -- a higher average than anticipated. Giving very high doses
of naltrexone has rarely produced improved results. Generally,
discontinuation trials with the drug have been safe. Those individuals
whose behavior worsened when the naltrexone was lowered almost
always re-established their previous improvement when the higher
dose was reinstated.

Successful Treatment Of Giddy
Disinhibition Disorder: Case
Study.
The concept of GDD has remained unreported for a number
of years. Although it seems to be a distinct clinical
diagnosis
with a specific
treatment for some individuals, other DD individuals presenting
with symptoms suggesting GDD did not respond to naltrexone. Furthermore,
the patients themselves could not give feedback about the effects
of treatment. However, in November 1997, a 17-year-old male without
developmental disabilities was treated successfully with naltrexone
for symptoms that were identified with GDD. The patient was in
constant trouble for impulsive acts throughout high school (e.g.,
he once sprayed fellow students with a spray bottle containing
urine). His behavioral problems began in middle school, and seemed
to improve when he was treated with methylphenidate. However, at
age 14 years, the patient’s symptoms of impulsive, socially
disruptive activities returned, and he was given the diagnosis
of Bipolar Disorder. He was then prescribed various stimulants,
as well as clonidine, imipramine, valproate, verapamil, and olanzapine,
without any success. When first seen by the author, the patient
was taking lithium and risperidone. He was briefly treated for
Obsessive- Compulsive Disorder, but the behavioral patterns suggesting
giddy disinhibition quickly became obvious. The patient’s
inability to respond to adult authority was notable. He also had
recently sustained a significant cut to his arm without noticing
it. Naltrexone 50 mg qAM was too sedating, but he tolerated 25
mg BID. The patient developed nearly instant control over his inappropriate
social reactivity. Once the patient began treatment with naltrexone,
both he and his parents rated his social improvement near 100%.
His weight was about 75 kg, thus he responded to a much lower dosage
of naltrexone (0.66 mg/kg) than used in most DD patients. He remained
on lithium and risperidone because there was still a question of
his having Bipolar Disorder.
The patient wrote the following statement about the effect of naltrexone
on his behavior:
"Before I was on naltrexone, I did not feel out of control
even though I was. When I would do something wrong, I would not
think
it was
wrong and I would just laugh about it. When teachers or parents
or anyone else would try to correct me, I would just laugh in
their
faces-- not because I wanted to make them mad, but just because
I could not help it. I would also laugh in other situations and
at
other things that were inappropriate. Before I was on any medication
at all, I often felt invincible -- like I could conquer the world
-- and would often stay awake for days at a time. When we started
fooling around with medicines, it did not do any good. We went
through many, many different medications and combinations of
medications
and they either made me worse and more active, or sedated me
to the point where I could hardly function and had many bad side
effects.
When I went on naltrexone, I noticed improvements immediately.
I did not feel the need to laugh at everyone and everything.
I have
more of a concept of right and wrong and what their consequences
are. I do not feel sedated, but I’m not out of control
for the first time in my life. I feel balanced and I enjoy life
very
much.”
Since 1997 a few other patients without D.D. have been seen with
symptoms suggesting GDD as part of their psychiatric history.
These patients identified another symptom -- that of disinhibited
response
to catastrophe. For example, in one patient’s history,
it was noted that when a schoolmate cracked his head in a fall
on concrete,
the sound was so peculiar that he could not help laughing loudly
in spite of the serious nature of the injury. As in the DD population,
not all individuals who presented with the symptoms have benefited
from naltrexone therapy.

Considerations About The Use Of Naltrexone:
Naltrexone has two Food and Drug Administration-approved
indications – the
treatment of narcotic addiction and alcohol dependency. Its use
in self-abusive behavior is documented in more than a dozen
references.3.
There have been reports in the literature of benefits using narcotic
antagonists in clinical states as diverse as Tourette’s Disorder,4. “narrative” hallucinatory
experiences,5. and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease,6. Various
theories exist concerning the nature of endorphin dysregulation in
these conditions. In cases where there is an immediate therapeutic
response, it is generally theorized that the “endorphin high” originates
from innately elevated endorphin activity rather than being related
to a learned behavior. Currently, naltrexone is the only oral narcotic
antagonist available, although others are being investigated.7.
Conclusion:
GDD is presented here as a previously unrecognized symptom cluster
seen predominately, but not exclusively, in the DD. population.
Symptoms of GDD include giddiness, laughing, and pain-seeking behaviors—symptoms
that are not included in the DSMIV criteria for ADHD or the Impulse-Control
Disorders. There are extreme cases in which the entire behavioral
pattern is dominated by GDD symptoms. A larger percentage of patients
demonstrate various GDD symptoms as one of several co-morbid states.
Both types of patients can demonstrate rapid improvement when treated
with an opioid receptor blocker like naltrexone, but some individuals
with typical GDD symptoms do not respond to this treatment. Since
a number of treated individuals do seem to demonstrate increasing
control over their giddy disinhibited behavior over time, there
remains the question of whether these symptoms represent a true
psychiatric disease state or whether they represent an extreme
case of immaturity. Other clinicians will need to determine if
GDD. is a valid diagnostic entity. Because its symptomology and
pharmacological treatment suggest an endorphin dysfunction, recognition
of this syndrome may open the way to definitive research into the
role of the endorphin system in psychiatric diseases other than
the substance abuse disorders.
Ralph Ankenman M.D.
Madison County Hospital
210 N. Main St.
London, OH 43140
References:
- Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4th
ed. Washington, DC : American Psychiatric Association; 1994.
- Sandman CA, Datta PC, Barron-Quinn J, Hoehler FJ, Williams C,
Swanson JM. Naloxone Attenuates Self-Abusive Behavior in Developmentally
Disabled Client. Appl. Research in Mental Retard. 1983;4:5-11.
- Barret RP, Feinstein C, Hole WT. Effects of Naloxone and Naltrexone
on Self-Injury: A Double-blind, Placebo-controlled
Analysis. Am J
Ment. Retardation. 1989; 93:644-651.
- McConville BJ, Normal
AB, Fogelson MH, Erenberg G. Sequential use of Opiod Antagonists
and Agonists in Tourette’s Syndrome.
Lancet. 1994; 343: 601.
- Watson SJ, et al. Effects of
Naloxone of Schizophrenia: Reduction in Hallucinations in a
Subpopulation of Subjects.
Science. 1978;
193:1242-1263.
- Reents SB, Beck CA Jr. Naloxone and
Naltrexone in COPD. Chest. 1988; 92:217-219.
- Mason BJ, Salvato
FR, Williams LD, Ritvo EC, Cutler RB. Nalmefene for Alcohol Dependence.
Archives of
General Psychiatry.
1999; 56:
719-724.

Appendix
|